Trader Horn is based upon the real-life adventures
of Alfred Aloysius “Trader” Horn and was reportedly the first non-documentary
film to be shot on location in Africa. Horn was one of those white guys who
traveled the rivers and jungles and plains of Africa trading goods like salt
for treasures like ivory, and he certainly must have had some fascinating encounters.
The film reportedly took six months to make as the crew went to the countries
of Tanganyika, Uganda, Kenya, Sudan, and the Belgian Congo with the help of “white
hunters” who are thanked by name in the opening credits.
It’s best to state up front that the film represents the
colonial attitude that many white explorers had towards the continent of Africa
and the African people there. Horn (played here by Harry Carey) thinks all of the
native tribespeople, including the bearers who do all the work on his expeditions,
are savages. It’s Peru (Duncan Renaldo, years away from his performances as the
Cisco Kid in the movies and on the TV series) who corrects Horn and says they’re
just “happy, ignorant children.” That certainly isn’t helpful since it’s just a
different form of condescension. It also isn’t helped any that this line
follows Peru looking at a series of African women with bare breasts.
I suppose it would be interesting to know if the filmmakers
were truly depicting the native villages with any measure of accuracy. There’s
an early sequence involving daily life where we see people getting their hair
braided, playing games, and talking with others. We get close-ups of their
faces and hairstyles and clothing, and we can only hope that these were all
correct depictions, but that does seem rather unlikely. At times, I thought
that perhaps some of the rituals performed during the movie might actually be a
mixture from different tribes. What could have been an intriguing ethnographic
film instead becomes a template for a lot of later movies set in Africa and the
continuing misrepresentation of the people of Africa.
One of the interesting aspects of the film is the footage of
the various animals Horn and Peru and their company encounter. It’s quite a
list, and I’m not even sure I was comprehensive in my accounting: hippos,
crocodiles, various birds, monkeys, giraffes, lions, Thompson’s gazelles, waterbuck,
hyenas, leopards, impala, buffalo, baboons, warthogs, eland, and many, many
more. It must have been like being on safari for the audiences in 1931, and I
guess the commentary as these men travel (almost a voiceover) is helpful in
identifying and describing the various animals. A bit of editing might have
helped, though, so we aren’t just cataloguing every creature they meet. By the
way, the threat of crocodiles seem particularly constant. Perhaps it’s because
the men travel by water, but you see a lot of crocodiles jumping off the shore
into the water as the film progresses. The Africa in Trader Horn
is just overrun with crocodiles. Again, a little more editing would have made
the film more interesting.
Other than introducing audiences to a lot of African
animals, the film concerns itself with the slimmest of plots. Horn and his
company meet a missionary named Edith Trent, whose baby daughter was kidnapped
by a tribe many years earlier. Her husband was also taken, but he was killed,
so now Mrs. Kent devotes her time to searching for their daughter. She doesn’t
get much time in the film, though, as she’s found dead herself in the next scene.
Horn and Peru decide that they must find the now grown daughter, so they begin
a trek across Africa to find the tribe that took the child.
They themselves are captured after the halfway mark of the
film and taken to a village controlled by Nina, the White Goddess (played by Edwina
Booth with wild eyes and a lot of frantic aggression and quite a cascade of long
blonde hair). She’s the daughter, of course, but now she’s in control of a
tribe and seems to maintain her power by beating people. She even beats Peru at
one point—right after he tells her “white people must help each other”—but he
just takes it, an act that intrigues her a great deal, but more on that later. They’re
forced to watch at the bearers are killed, and then they’re tied to crosses and
hoisted upside down and about to be lit on fire when Nina finally stops the villagers.
Even though she doesn’t speak any English, she’s decided to escape with them
across a lake. How she figured out who they are and where she came from and
what she has in common with them is all very mysterious.
The film then proceeds to put everyone in the cast in
danger. Horn, Peru, Nina and Horn’s most loyal bearer, Rencharo (Mutia Oomulu,
giving the part more dignity than it truly deserves) take a wooden canoe across
a lake filled with hippos, some of the most aggressive and dangerous animals in
the water. They later try to take some meat away from a pack of lions and almost
get Nina killed. Horn had already pointed out about the wilds of Africa: “When
you're not eating somebody, you're trying to keep somebody else from eating you.”
That certainly seems to be the case for most of the film.
The cinematography for the film is quite lovely, but it is
rather dark at times so that can make it tough to see all of what’s on the
screen. The scenic vista shots are beautiful, and the sequence by a waterfall
is quite breathtaking. But the film cannot seem to pick a rhythm to go with the
action. At times, it cranks up the movement via fast motion, but why? We’ve had
a long, languid walk across the veldt, but now that something exciting is
happening, we need to speed it up? I realize it’s not a key plot point, but I
was also fascinated by the enormous pith helmet Peru wears throughout the film,
and it’s looking pretty rough by the end. Is it meant to be symbolic? Of what
exactly?
Nina’s old tribe shows up to scare everyone into running,
splitting up into pairs to be more efficient. Ranchero dies by Horn’s side, allowing
the film to superimpose his image over the African skyline at the film’s end in
one of the most maudlin moments I’ve seen in a while. Nina and Peru get rescued
(if that’s the word for it) by a group of pygmies, who take then safely to a
village and then to a trading post to be reunited with Horn just before he puts
them both on a ship to leave. You see, Nina has to be educated so that she can
be her true self; that means she’ll be white again according to the racialized
thinking of the movie. Horn will stay behind in Africa and see Ranchero’s face
in the sky.
The novelty of the film’s subject matter and the images of
Africa must have been the key aspects that got it nominated for Best Picture. Carey
plays a crusty old adventurer with a lot of gusto, certainly, and Renaldo makes
for a handsome “love interest.” Seeing the two men side-by-side does make a viewer
wonder how they both thought that Nina might pick them. Isn’t it clear that she’d
choose the good-looking younger man with the impressive sideburns (not to
mention the size of his pith helmet)? Then again, watching this movie nowadays
raises so many questions. How staged were the animal attacks? Why are there drums
in the background for so much of the film? Were there not other, better movies
in this year that were eligible for awards consideration?
Oscar Nomination: Outstanding Production